Monday, July 28, 2008

Book Review: " Pakistan: Sovereignty Lost" by Khurram Iqbal Awan & zamurrad Awan


Pakistan:Sovereignty Lost


Pakistan: Sovereignty Lost

By Shahid ur RehmanMr.Books, Islamabad

ISBN: 969-8500-01-4

252 pp. Rs 395.00

……………………………………..

Reviewed by Khurram Iqbal Awan & Zamurrad Awan

zamurredawan@yahoo.comM.phil, political Science

Government College University Lahore

…………………………………….


Foreign Dept is a matter of serious concern when u especially look the situation in to a national security paradigm. It does not only determine the internal condition of a state but also vibrantly communicate the international settings of a that particular state. The real problem arises when the heavy external borrowing could not be used appropriately, therefore no productivity could be ensure.such type of situation leave a deep impact upon the sovereignty of a an independent state.


Mr Shaid ur Rehman, a veteran journalist known for his economic and diplomatic reports, has beautifully figure out the the details of loans which has been miss-used by the governemnt of Pakistan. He said pointed out that the Pakistan contracted loan of worth $80 billion, however $70 billion has been repaid and $ 35 billion yet has to repay. the highly criticised point of the government strategy is that the government of Pakistan in different point of view keep on asking for resheduling or dept relief without realising the heavy burden on Pakatan’s economy in future.
while defining the history of indeptedness in Pakistan, writer shifted the blamed from economic to political decisions, as he said “it’s a national tragedy that not a single Pime Minister, President opr a a military ruler , in the peiod of 59 years, honourably left his office.”In 1947 the first loan was sought by Quaid-e-Azam, worth $2billion immediatelty after independence from the United States, as Pakistan was unable to meet their expenses being a newly born country.anopther request was claimed under the signature of Liaquat Ali khan after the after two days of his assasination, which was really a susopecious act as US envoy Avra Warren met to LiaquatAli khan, four days back and asked for Pakistan to contribute towards Middle East defence. Liaquat made the contribution contingent on a Kashmir solution and not on $2 billion. In fact, Liaquat was broaching a joint defence with Iran and Egypt, against the western bloc.


Shahid ur Rehman tells that in 1952 Wheat was importated to Pakisatn From US with the signs of “Thank you America” hanging from the animals’ necks. that show the serious sign of soveregnity lose in Pakistan, at the same time India on such an aid didnt show any gratituide to the US. Moreover, Writer consider Ayub Khan hihgly responsible to grant the Badaber Base to US to get economic assistance, which add insult to the injury.Shahid ur Rehman reveals that 1989-90 was the first financial year during which debt repayment came first in the federal budget, getting ahead of defence and development (P.74).


Writer veilout that Since 1990, Pakistan is paying $39 million every year to encash one National Highway Authority bond worth $22 million and “nobody knows when, how and why these bonds were issued” (P.84).During 1988-99, loan packages were concluded with IMF by caretaker governments and later signed by prime ministers Benazir and Nawaz Sharif governments the most suprising reality is this, there is no accountablity on these debts.


Every new governemnt didnt try to deal with trhe issue of hight debt crisi , moreover they put t he3ior 100% effort to hide the real view of Pakistan economy from their country man.In 2002 Mr Shuakat Aziz, the then finance minister reportedly told the Paris Club that he would be unable to go back to Pakistan, if he did not get debt relief. The Musharraf government has repaid $27 billion ($20.5 billion principal and $6.5 billion interest) and has reduced the debt by $1 billion. It indicates the borrowings by the military-led government.Shahid ur Rehman figure out that the total external debt of Pakistan is now 54% GDP.


Writer clearly tells that the forign assistance is a serious matter which should be dealt intelligence. if the country take such issues causually then the country would be subservient to out side powers and lending agencies by creating perpetual dependence on them. the same happend to Pakistan.Though, the writer by using original source matrial make a view of debt history of Pakistan but at the same time he has figured out the present scernario with the implications of weak economy on Paksiatn in future.

Saturday, July 12, 2008

Kartarpur Corridor: Gateway to South Asian peace

Kartarpur Corridor
Gateway to South Asian peace
Tridivesh Singh Maini



If one glances through journals and newspapers, or is in an erudite gathering, religion/faith is represented as one of the major causes of global conflict and whenever any discussion about religion begins, the topic is subtly changed. The general refrain towards religion is either, that “religion is a personal issue” (which is not incorrect), or that “religion is responsible for most of the world’s conflicts”, (which is definitely a very half baked thought, though perhaps those who follow this strand of thinking can not distinguish religion from religious fanaticism/false interpretation of religion). Scholars tend to forget that religion can also help in acting as a peacemaker/bridge. It really depends upon how we define “faith” and who propagates it.

In this article, I will use the case study of the “Kartarpur Corridor” (an arrangement where Sikh pilgrims wanting to pay obeisance at then historical Sikh shrine of Kartarpur Sahib located in Pakistan can enter the Pakistani territory without a visa, on the premise that they will return to Indian territory on the same day) being demanded by Sikhs to illustrate how the tenets of Sikhism have helped and are helping in “building bridges” between India and Pakistan [i]. It may be argued that the desire of Sikhs to visit their sacred religious shrines like (Gurdwara Janam Sthan, Nankana Sahib, Punja Sahib and Sacha sauda to name a few) has played a crucial part in improving relations between the two Punjabs (this has contributed positively to Indo- Pak relationship) [ii].
Sikhism as a “bridge” between India and Pakistan

It is a fact that Guru Nanak Dev, founder of the Sikh faith, is revered by many Muslims who respectfully refer to him as Baba Nanak. In fact, the essence of Sikhism is evident from a very famous painting in which one sees Guru Nanak Dev surrounded by both a Hindu (Bala) and a Muslim (Mardana). In one of my recent books titled “South Asian Cooperation and the Role of the Punjabs”, I myself have laid stress on this aspect of Sikhism, which none of us should forget [iii]. In view of the fundamental Sikh message of religious co-existence the Kartarpur Corridor can act as a bridge between two important nations of South Asia namely India and Pakistan.

The other clear illustration of this very aspect is the fact that, the foundation stone of the Golden Temple (Harimandir Sahib) was laid by Mian Mir, a Muslim Sufi Saint (this in spite of the strained relations between the Sikhs and Mughals of that time) [iv]. It is also important to remember that important verses of Baba Farid and other Sufi saints were included in the Guru Granth Sahib [v] by Sikh Gurus.

Before talking about the Kartarpur Corridor, I would like to make it clear that while most Sikhs respect other religions including Islam, some are under the influence of religious bigots who depict Sikh-Muslim relationship in poor light to further their narrow agendas. Organizations like the Rashtriya Swayam Sewak Sangh or the RSS, a Hindu nationalist organization depict Muslims and non-Muslims (especially Sikhs) as natural enemies; such organizations keep harping on the Sikh suffering during Partition of 1947 and on the historic Mughal-Sikh rivalry (they conveniently forget the sacrifices made by Peer Buddu Shah and his family, not to forget Bhai Mardana’s unflinching loyalty to Guru Nanak Dev) [vi]. So, sometimes serious attempts are made to obliterate an important aspect of Sikhism, namely religious co-existence, and it would not be incorrect to say that the attitude of most Sikhs toward their Punjabi brethren across the Wagah [vii] is best described as below:

“After coming to this side of the border we have no alien feeling as we belonged to this area and you belonged to East Punjab, our forefathers were born and later buried in this land besides it was the land of our Guru and we are here to pay homage and offer rituals especially to celebrate Basaikhi with our Pakistani brothers."
A background to Kartarpur Sahib

It is as a result of the efforts of Captain Amarinder Singh (former Chief Minister of Punjab) that the Amritsar-Nankana Sahib bus service has begun and the efforts of overseas Sikhs (especially those based in the United States) that Sikhs have gained access to important shrines like Nankana Sahib (the birth place of the first Sikh Guru, Guru Nanak Dev) and Punja Saheb. In doing so the Sikh ardas (daily supplication) “Hey Akal Purkh! Apne Panth de sada sahai Datar jio! Sri Nankana Sahib te hor Gur-duarian Gur-dhaman de, jinhan ton Panth nun vichhoria gia hai, khullhe darshan didar te seva sanbhal da dan Khalsa ji nin bakhsho” which if translated into English would mean “O immortal God! The constant Helper of his own Panth (Sikh Community), kindly confer the gift of visiting, maintaining, controlling and worshipping, without any restrictions, the Gurdwara of Nankana Sahib Ji, other Gurdwaras, and Gurus Mansions, of which the Khalsa has been deprived” (by the Partition of India) has been answered [viii].

Sikhs are also looking for a religious corridor from Dera Baba Nanak (Indian Punjab) to Kartarpur Sahib, which is located on the Pakistani side and is less then 2 miles from the border [ix].
Guru Nanak spent 17 years of his life in Kartarpur, where he attracted followers from the Hindu and Muslim communities. Kartarpur is a perfect illustration of the pluralist culture of the sub continent, as when Guru Nanak Dev passed away at Kartarpur (in 1539) both Hindus and Muslims laid claim to his body. Ultimately it was decided that overnight, flowers would be placed by both Hindus and Muslims on his body. Whoever’s flowers withered next morning would lose claim. The next morning when the cloth was removed, the body was missing and flowers of both communities were found in the same shape as they had been put in. The two communities finally decided to divide the cloth, and the Muslims buried it while the Hindus consigned it to fire [x]. Therefore both a grave and a smadh exist here. It is correct to say that Dera Baba Nanak, is sacred to all religions as three shrines of Guru Nanak exit in the form of an Islamic grave, a Hindu samadh and the Sikhs’ angitha. Nowhere else in the world three shrines of a single person coexist [xi].

It might be pertinent to mention here that while Sir Cyril Radcliffe (the man in charge of the partition of the sub-continent) was able to divide India and Pakistan but could not divide Kartarpur. When Radcliffe drew the line between India and Pakistan in 1947, the declaration gave the entire Gurdaspur district to Pakistan, but the plan fell threw and the re-division put Kartarpur on the border. A bridge, which joined the two Gurdwaras was bombarded during the 1965 Indo-Pak war. [xii] Perhaps the Almighty desired that this part of the Punjab would once again act as a “bridge” between the two Punjabs and between India and Pakistan.
The demand for a corridor at Kartarpur
The Sikh demand for a religious corridor has been gaining momentum in the last few years and two organizations have been working for this cause -- the Darshan Abhilashi Sanstha led by Kuldip Singh Wadala a senior politician from Indian Punjab and Mr. BS Goraya a peace activist who has set up an organization Kartarpur Sangat Langah. They have been working earnestly since 2001 for the peace corridor proposed to be built between Dera Baba Nanak and Kartarpur Saheb [xiii]. While Wadala has been using political platforms and the media to promote this veritable cause, Mr. BS Goraya brings out a Punjabi magazine which carries articles on the Kartarpur Corridor and other Gurdwaras in Pakistan.

It might be pertinent to mention here that “It was during Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s Lahore visit in 1999 that the Pakistan offered to build a 2 km corridor to enable Indians to visit Gurdwara Dera Sahib without a visa or passport, he points out” [xiv].

As a result of the sincere and earnest efforts of the Darshan Abhilashi Sanstha and Kartarpur Sangat Langah (with support from Captain Amarinder Singh former Chief Minister of East Punjab), the Pakistan government has agreed to the demand of Sikh devotees and this corridor, would be fenced on both sides and no passport or visa would be required, but pilgrims would have to go back the same day [xv]. The Government of Pakistan has now left the ball in the Government of India’s court. According to a newspaper report:

Recently on a visit to India, The PSGPC(Pakistan Sikh Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee) president said the government of Pakistan had already accepted the demand of the Sikh community to construct a corridor between Dera Baba Nanak (India) and Gurdwara Kartarpur Sahib (Pakistan). He said Pakistan expected a reciprocal gesture from India so that Sikh devotees could undertake pilgrimage of these gurdwaras without any visa hassles [xvi].

The babus (government functionaries) in the Government of India should pay some heed to the following lines of WH Auden’s poem “Look before you leap” [xvii]:

The sense of danger must not disappear:The way is certainly both short and steep,However gradual it looks from here;Look if you like, but you will have to leap.

On the pretext of “national security” there has been enough procrastination on this issue. The time has come to leap and move forward with the religious corridor at Kartarpur. Perhaps the best tribute to Guru Nanak Dev’s philosophy and the ecumenical principles and tenets of Sikhism is to go ahead with the Kartarpur Corridor, which could act as the gateway to South Asian peace and prosperity.


REFERENCES

[i] Mr Aitzaz Ahsan, former Law, Justice, Interior and Education Minister of Pakistan and Author of Indus Saga made this important point while delivering his speech during the third annual Sher-e-Punjab Maharaja Ranjit Singh Memorial Lecture held at the India Islamic Culture Centre in New Delhi on December 15th 2006. For understanding the influence of both the Bhakti Movement and Sufism on the Sikh faith see Singh, Patwant (1999) “The Sikhs”, pg.16-18 (Harper Collins, New Delhi) ,Also see Neki JS(2007) “Guru Granth Sahib and its context”, pg. 229 (Bhai Vir Singh Sahitya Sadan, New Delhi) for an explanation of the spiritual commonalities between Sikhism and Islam.

[ii] For the improvement in relationship see Maini, TS (2007) “South Asian Cooperation and the Role of the Punjabs”(Siddhartha Publications, New Delhi)

[iii] Maini, TS (2007) “South Asian Cooperation and the Role of the Punjabs”, see pg.87 for the painting of Guru Nanak Dev

[iv]For information on Mian Mir’s links with Sikh Gurus, see Interview with “Makhdoom Syed Chan Pir Qadri on Sikh Muslim Relations”, Issue No.5, October 2002, Sikh Spectrum Website: http://www.sikhspectrum.com/102002/pir_sahib.htm

[v] For the influence of Baba Farid on the Guru Granth Sahib see Neki JS (2007) “ Guru Granth Sahib and its context” pgs. 219-227, 228-229 also See Maini TS, pgs.86-93

[vi] Such propaganda was at it’s peak in 2000 during the earlier Akali-BJP Government in Punjab. Unfortunately many BJP/RSS acolytes still try to promote the view that Sikhs are Anti-Muslim.

[vii] Bhatti, A “Sikh Pilgrims feel at home in Pakistan”, The News, Lahore, April 4th 2007[viii] English translation of Ardas taken from Harbans Singh Doabia “Sacred Nitnem” (1998)

[ix] For Captain Amarinder Singh’s role see The Times of India “ Buses to Sikh shrines in Pakistan” , May 25th 2004, Walia, V “ CM to raise Gurdwara upkeep issue” The Tribune, Chandigarh, January 31st 2004

[x] For the history of Kartarpur Sahib, see Kartarpur Sahib website: www.kartarpurcorridor.com[xi] The Tribune “Call for support to gurdwara corridor”, April 29th 2004

[xii] See Kartarpur Corridor website: Maini, TS (2007) “South Asian Cooperation and the Role of the Punjabs”

[xiii] Interviews with BS Goraya and Kuldip Singh Wadala, See The Tribune “ Wadala threatens dharna at PMO” May 15th 2007, The Tribune, “ Allow visa-free travel to Pak gurdwaras says Wadala”, November 1st 2007

[xiv] The Tribune “Call for support to gurdwara corridor”, April 29th 2004[xv] See Maini, TS, pg.74

[xvi] Walia, V “ Representation for women in PSGPC”, The Tribune, Chandigarh March 21st 2007

[xvii] “Leap before you look” WH Auden,

Saturday, June 28, 2008

Book Review: "South Asian Cooperation and the Role of Punjabs" by Zamurrad Awan


Punjab-Punjab Cooperation

South Asian Cooperation and the Role of Punjabs
By Tridivesh Singh Maini
Siddharth Publications, New Delhi
ISBN: 81-7220-186-9
161pp. Rs 275.00
……………………………………..
Reviewed by Zamurrad Awan
zamurredawan@yahoo.com
student of M.phil, political Science dept
Government College University Lahore
…………………………………….


Regional cooperation in present world scenario is considered as an important ingredient of developmental process in a region. But a region like South Asia which shares its long history of bi-lateral disputes usually has lot of challenges for its future endeavors. In this region, the regional cooperation appeared in a form of South Asian Association of Regional Cooperation (SAARC) which was formed on the initiative of Mr. Zia-ur-Rehman in 1985. The Association consists on India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Maldives, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Afghanistan as current members but China, European Union, Iran, Japan, Unite States of America and Korea have been given a status of observers. The organization was made originally with the intention of the trade and investment promotion in the region but social and political environment does not let these objectives towards their attainment. Although the countries of this region do share a long history of its heritage, especially its member countries India and Pakistan and Bangladesh passed several years with each other so that’s why few provinces of these countries share common culture and heritage. The peculiarity of this region can surely help to enhance generally social, political and particularly economic cooperation among the countries of this region.


By giving a road map of regional cooperation the author of South Asian Cooperation, Tridivesh Singh Maini being a writer and peace activist emphasized on the contribution of East and West Punjab in the development of SAARC. Miani being a proponent of Indo-Pak healthy relations struggles to highlight the role of Punjabs in both countries for the betterment of not only the strain relations between them but also for the promotion of economic development in the region. He proves that by using the tactics of dialogue the objectives of peace and stability can easily be achieved. For this purpose in his book, after elaborating briefly the important developments in SAARC, he discusses the issues of main concern (Kashmir) in between Pakistan and India with his suggestion of economic and functional integration among countries of South Asia.


While emphasizing the effective role of Countries in regional cooperation, the author of the book skillfully highlights a strong linkage between the Punjabs of India and Pakistan as they share common culture and heritage. They make their attitudes flexible from last 5 to 6 years through the initiative of bus service from Amritsar to Lahore and after that from Amritsar to Nankana Shahab. The flexibility is more vibrant on the part of Pakistani government as they agreed to the demand of Sikh devotees to visit their shrines in West Punjab which was highly appreciated by Amarinder Singh who is a Punjab Chief Minister of east Punjab. Miani attract the reader by giving glimpse of the work of great writers, poets, professionals, saints and Sufis from East and West Punjab who worked without the boundary constraints of their countries and spread the message of peace, love, freedom and welfare, ultimately promote the Punjabiat. Baba Guru Nanak, Baba Bully Shah, Peer Waris Shah are those Punjabi poets who through poetry spread the great message of unity between both provinces. The promotion of Punjabi culture was further highlighted by the ruler Maharaja Ranjit Singh and after that generous contributor Dyal Singh Majitha and Gnaga Ram worked for the welfare in the period of pre-partition. After independence Fakhar Zaman as a chairperson of World Punjabi Congress worked for the promotion of Punjabiat in the country. NGOS with the name of Lok Sagat and Sachet Kitab Ghar further promoted the Punjabi scripts through seminars and their publications.


A smooth transition form the cultural homogeneity to the economic ground in between the West and East Punjab can be superbly identified in Miani’s book, as he after defining the strong common heritage comes to the economic field where both side Punjab can support each other through the productivity of their agriculture. In productivity, where Pakistani Punjab is best in cotton production Indian Punjab is ahead in other crops. The reasons of low production in both Punjabs are almost the same. In this regard Writer gave some recommendation to overcome the issue of production through well networking, efficient marketing system, Joint India–Pakistan Basmati Patent project, through cooperative system of Canal irrigation and last but not least through more flexible and trust worthy attitude towards not only each other but towards the other countries effort who are the part of South Asia. In this regard Miani pin point the other fields of cooperation to ensure further development in the region generally and in Punjab of both sides particularly. He very rationally consider governments, professional, common citizens, public opinion, efficient communication system, business endeavors, funding and the religious harmony as the tools of diplomacy for both Punjabs to make them close.

Miani, at the end of this book give some suggestions for the improvement of relations not only between both Punjabs but also among the South Asian countries. he recommended, free movement of people through making the visa process easy, opening up of trade routes, modernized structure of trade, improved communication facilities on national level, formation of a joint trade office at Wagah, setting up of a joint Punjab of Commerce at Wagah and politically the welcoming attitude of all countries of region towards each other.


Nonetheless, through a ground breaking research work the author visualized the vigorous picture of future in his imagination through the trust worthy cooperation and hard work among South Asian countries, which would ultimately not only boost the economic and socio-political development in both Punjabs but finally would contribute in to the development of this region.

Friday, June 13, 2008

Post-Election Scenario of Pakistani Politics by Zamurrad Awan and Yawar Hayat Shah

Post-Election Scenario of Pakistani Politics



The result of polls held on February 18, 2008, has spoken unambiguously the will of the people of Pakistan, in favor of two main stream parties the Pakistan Muslim League and the Pakistan Peoples Party. Theses two parties cherished majority votes in National Assembly as well as in four provincial assemblies. The mainstream parties, PPP and PML (N) along with Pakistan National Alliance joined their hands for a new coalition government. No doubt these parties have their own agendas and manifestos but they united on a single platform in the interest of the whole nation. In the politics of reconciliation for the broader interest of the country, the MQM was also requested to work as coalition partner in the new set up, which was after few deliberations was to be accepted despite of the past rivalries between the PPP and MQM as there is no permanent friend and foe in politics.


The unexpected results of these elections further veil out the fake policies of previous government who left the sever challenges for the new government. The consequences of these policies came out in the form of inflation, whole day black out, suicide bombing, cut back on jobs and last but not the least a national staple from the market. Along with these problems, the demand by ‘pro-active’ lawyers for restoration of judiciary further confronted the situation. The prevailed unrest in country immediately demanded from a democratically elected government with the smooth transfer of power and, no doubt the winning parties tried to make a new set up accordingly. However, the reconciliatory approach of winning parties could not come out with the expected results and the unpleasant events kept on diverting the attentions of new government along with the public. The most objectionable event was the harassment of prominent members of Pakistani Muslim League (Q), former Chief Minister Sindh, Mr Ghulam Arbab Raheem in the Sindh Assembly session, when an angry mob of activists encircled him and hurled abuses on him. Meanwhile one man hit Arbab’s face with a shoe where as other workers did try to hit him with fists and shoes. Similarly, Former Minister of Parliamentary affairs Dr Sher Afgan Niazi was swooped down by the mob apparently showing themselves lawyers, when he was brought out of his advocate office under the secuity of police to rescue. The series of such events was an organized afford from the people who wanted to snuff out democracy.


The former government left the Pakistan’s economy in a quagmire. The socio-economic condition of Pakistan is becoming intense day by day; therefore the state appears rudderless, even in the presence of two major political parties together with their allies in government. From its day first the new government is handicapped by the lawyers’ movement for restoration of judges. The PML (N) included in its manifesto for elections, the restoration of judges the key point, however, thought PPP was in favor of independent judiciary but they did not make any commitment to the people regarding this issue. It’s an ultimate reality that both parties are agreed on the restoration of judges however, the difference is just only on the method of re-instatement of judges. PPP wants a restoration through a constitutional package, conversely PML(N) want the restoration of judiciary first without the compulsion of constitutional package at the same time. Consequently, the most awaited talks between the head of ruling parties ended up on a sad note on 12th May, when PML(N) head Nawaz Sharif decided to quit from the Federal cabinet as he could make his promise to restore judges in the confined time period. While talking to the Press conference, he said that his party would not become a part of any conspiracy against the democratic government and would not strengthen the President Musharraf camp. He further insisted that his party is still in coalition with PPP and would support the government according to the Charter of Democracy.


To get rid of all evils of the former government, newly elected Prime Minster Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani declared a 100 days package after getting the unanimous vote of confidence from the National Assembly. The judicial crisis has crippled the whole governmental machinery. Lawyers have become a pressure group. They have become an obstacle on the way of resolution of other issues which are directly related to the common masses. The restoration of judiciary is a constitutional matter and it will be resolved constitutionally. As Co-chairperson of PPP Asif Ali Zardari has stated that he would not amend an illegal act by another illegal step. PML (N) and lawyers’ community should wait for some time for the restoration of the judiciary. Now lawyers have called for the Long March. That will be the first step of agitation against the newly born government. Though it’s their democratic right but matters should be resolved amicably. On the other hand there is no clear demarcation of powers and authority between the President and the Prime Minister. According to the 1973 constitution, the form of government is parliamentary, however, the tempering with the constitution by the presidency along with his ally parties, the presidential system is working in the country. Where all the powers reside in the office of president, who has already generated strained relations among the institutions. There is no system of checks and balances; consequently, the political system of Pakistan lacks the doctrine of separation of powers. Due to this deficiency the political system is in mayhem. Therefore, the public have serious resentment against the president Musharaff, who despite of the defeat of his ally party PML (Q) in general elections, is not ready to resign.


While keeping in view socio-political vulnerability along with economic deficits of the country, now people are desirous to hear the debate of Finance Minister while presenting the annual budget for the fiscal year of 2008-09. There is a ray of hope; people think that they will get some relief in the upcoming budget as government is saying again and again that next budget will be the people friendly budget. At this point of time people are more concerned about the wheat crisis, energy shortage, increasing inflation and unemployment. The people of Pakistan are desperate and hopeless because of the situation emerging in the country. This situation is resulted in frustration among youth who are the real builders of future. After passing a long journey of education they can not get suitable jobs according to their academic qualifications. Whole system is victim of the corruption, nepotism, red tapism and bribery. Many qualified but poor youngsters have been deprived from their right to job, as the jobs are given to the sons, nephews and relatives of the powerful people. The current situation of Pakistan is same as Thomas Hobbes’ state of nature. Where people were living under the principle of ‘Might is Right’ and there was a ‘perpetual war of everyone against everyone’. The need of hour seeks serious action to tackle immediate issues, which the country is facing. Though the institutional independence is significantly an important demand to deal with, however, there are so many other issues related to the common man of the country, which should be resolve first.


Zamurrad Awan & Yawar Hayat Shah
e.mail:zamurredawan@yahoo.com

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Dismembered Coalition Reveals the Truth by Yawar Hayat Shah & Zamurrad Awan


Dismembered Coalition Reveals the Truth



The most awaited talks between the head of ruling parties finally ended up on a sad note, as it was feared by a number political pundits that the honeymoon between Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and Pakistan Muslin League- Nawaz(PML-N)or, more specifically, between Asif Ali Zardari and Nawaz Sharif will not last. Since the government formation has completed, the judicial crisis was seeking an immediate resolution, though the other issues remained a matter of serious concern for the newly elected government.

The coalition government promised the nation in the ‘Bhurban Declaration’ that judicial crisis will be solved within thirty days of the creation of the government. Thirty of the April was set as the deadline for the restoration of the judiciary as it was on November 2, 2007. Due to some complexities it would not be happened on the April 30, 2008 and the new deadline was announced in Dubai Talks by both parties that was May 12, 2008.

Last fifteen days made an environment of the country more suspicious as the PPP and PML (N) hold discussions for hours together to sort out a way, but both parties told the media that they had failed to bridge differences over the route to take for the reinstatement of the deposed judges. Leadership of both parties was there in London to hold talks on the issue. Despite the last minute intervention of the US Assistant Secretary of State Richard Boucher, London Talks collapsed.

Finally 12th May proved itself a decisive one and PML leaders reached back to Pakistan. After having long meetings with the headship of Pakistan People Party in London, Pakistan Muslim League (N) decided to quit from the federal cabinet. Nawaz sharif while talking with media that his party will not become a part of any conspiracy against the democratic government and will not strengthened the President Musharraf camp. He told the media that his party will sit on the treasury benches and will support the government according to the Charter of Democracy.

On the other hand, Co-chairman of PPP Asif Ali Zaradari has requested to Nawaz Sharif through a phone call and requested to hold his decision of resignation from the Federal Government till his return from London. He also has announced that the portfolios of the PML (N) ministers will be kept vacant and no candidate will contest against Nawaz Sharif in by-poll. He advised the Prime Mininster Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani not to accept the resignation of PML (N) ministers. He is confident that the PML ( N) would return to the fold of the coalition soon.

PPP’s stance is that an illegal and unconstitutional action cannot be undo by taking equally illegal and unconstitutional step. This domino effect will cause the fall of whole administrative system of the state. Party is reiterating that judiciary will be restored through a resolution in parliament along with a constitutional package that wil ensure the supremacy and independence of the judiciary. PML (N) stressed government that it should announce the reinstatement of deposed judges through an executive order.

So it can be analyzed that the differences between the two parties were over the modalities and not on the objective of the restoration of the judiciary. As both parties are still emphasizing that judiciary will be restored as it was promised with the masses of Pakistan,

At this point in time, media is playing a role of catalyst, different news channels are telecasting diverse version of news. Every channel is interpreting the issue in its own way to create more ambiguity among the masses. Some News channels had telecasted the news that Nawaz Sharif has declared the end of coalition. In reality he did not talk about the break up of the coalition. In the time of this kind of deadlock media should not play irresponsible role to create a state of disappointment among people. Both leaders have political heads and knew the hopes and aspiration of the people of the land. They are taking steps like shrewd politicians and playing their card tactically. As PPP’s Co-Chairman declared that PPP will continue the support of PML (N) government in Punjab. Therefore, it can be judged that coalition has not come to its end. In fact, the both ruling parties are not in the position to quit the alliance, which is pertinent to sustain democracy in the country.
Yawar Hayat Shah
Zamurrad Awan

Monday, May 5, 2008

A Blur Statement of Election Commission on delaying by-polls


A Blur Statement of Election Commission on delaying by-polls


Suddenly, a suspected environment took place in the country over the postponement of by-polls in the country on 5th May. The plea presented by Election Commission, under taking such step was “deteriorating law and order situation”, which was undoubtedly an irrational statement according to the current security situation. It was an abrupt decision with out taking the ruling elite in to the confidence, therefore it provoked they democratic process once again in the country.

The quick reaction was seen by Pakistan Peoples Party, Pakistan Muslim League (N) and the coalition partners, who consider it a conspiracy against the new government under the order of presidency. These by-elections were of great significant as the important leaders like Mr. Shehbaz Sharif, Capatin Safdar from PML(N) whereas An important figure Barrister Aitezaz Ahsan and the co-chairman of PPP Mr Asif Ali Zardari was going to take part. These figures since the election commenced on 18th February are keeping on condemning the presidency. Resultantly, in make the Musharff’s restless as he is no more considered to be fit in this office. However, its important to note that ‘The Wall Street Journal’ reported on Monday that Musharraf seeks a deal with PPP to secure his position as he isn’t agree to quit his powers as president of the state. Conversely, he is worried about the restoration f judges, who ready after the re-instatement to ditch his rule

In this situation, its not easy for government to take the decision on the restoration of judges, on the other hand, they don’t have any other way to move without full-filling their promise as the expectations of the people of Pakistan are high enough. Therefore, it seems as the ruling parties are trying to find the middle way to secure both ends though the Musharff is keep on derailing the democratic system by planning intrigues against the new set-up. The situation could only be improved if Musharff accepts his defeat open heartedly as he has plundered the country by all means.


Shehzadi Zamurrad Awan

Politicize Justice by Shehzadi Zamurrad Awan






Politicize Justice

The election of 18th February did not only decide the real will of the people of Pakistan but also gave a great sense of responsibility to the new government. The main alliance parties in government, Pakistan Peoples Party and Pakistan Muslim League (N), soon after the election results focused on the issue resolving strategy with the help of consensus building among the power sharing parties. The first issue which was acknowledged to be the most important one among all powers sharing powers was the restoration of Justice by re-instatement of all judges. After this, it was expected that the lawyers’ movement would exclude the element of violence from their struggle. However, the immediate events after the making of new government proved this expectation a fake one.

To re-instate the judges on the position of 9th March is not an easy task as it apparently perceives, especially when the government is bound to work with an un-constitutional man in the form of president. Though, judiciary being a separate institution has its sanctity which could only be maintained after the re-instatement of judges, however, for the smooth change, its important to give the government proper time to resolve this issue without emphasizing on the particular ultimatums.

The incident with former Minister for Law and Parliamentary affairs Dr Sher Afgan Niazi on 8th April in Lahore was an effort to defame the lawyers’ movement and lot of deliberations took place by the lawyers. However, the reverse action was seen in Karachi, in which eleven people were killed, at least six of them feared to be lawyers, and several others injured when violence broke on the clash between two groups of lawyers outside the City. These two events significantly affected the lawyers’ movement. Mr.Aitezaz Ahzan, the president Supreme Court, continuously kept on identifying some hidden hands that are doing intrigues against the lawyers’ movement.

The incident on 5th March in Rawalpindi Bar is an important one, where Aitezaz Ahsan was going to address about his contest in by-polls from NA-55; suddenly a fight had started between the two groups of lawyers. However, it was controlled by the senior lawyers. But again when Mr Aitezaz started his speech again, a lawyer used an abusive language against one of the correspondent of TV channel, which disturbed the whole gathering. Therefore, Media boycotted the conference; however it was patched up after a while.

Justice is not a matter of once own choice. It’s the universal phenomenon which should not be used for the personal benefit of any person or party. To keep the lawyers struggle alive, it’s important, not to politicize it. Otherwise it would loose its real objective and the struggle for the restoration of judges would be derailed.

Zamurrad Awan
zamurredawan@yahoo.com

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Law of Necessity & the Constitution of Pakistan



Law of Necessity & the Constitution of Pakistan


Constitution is a legal document, which undoubtedly provides a guideline to run the country affairs. Therefore the constitution is considered to be a supreme document. Its respect and sanctity is binding on every individual in the country. Unfortunately, in Pakistan it’s the most vulnerably handled document. It has been tempered many times under the catchphrase of necessity by the ruling elite.


On April 21, Supreme Court of Pakistan scrapped the condition of graduation which was imposed by perviaz Musharaf in 2002. The reason coded behind this action was that this condition is repugnant to the fundamental rights mentioned in 1973 constitution. However, on July 11, 2002, a five member bench of Supreme Court had upheld the graduation condition for legislators on a petition moved by the PMLQ.


From 2002 to 2008, the period of 6 years couldn't compensate the legality of this law and no one pointed out its confrontation with the fundamental principle mentioned in the constitution. As the matter of fact, in 2002 Musharaff used this order to keep some individuals out of the Parliament with out keeping in view its compatibility with the constitution. Now when the 2008 elections are over, government has been formed and only bi-polls are left, this condition has been lifted up by the Supreme Court. It should be done before the election 2008, so that the maximum people could get the benefit out of it. But now it would facilitate few important individuals who are going to file their nomination papers for bi-polls.


Pakistan is passing through its sensitive phase of its history. All decisions are under the spot light of media. Consequently, the people of Pakistan are vigilant enough to judge the political scenario. It’s the time for government to come out the influence of necessity law. It’s important on the part of law making bodies to discuss the policies and laws to avoid any ambiguity. It’s only the way to attain the general acceptability of any decision among the people.

Shehzadi Zamurrad Awan
zamurredawan@yahoo.com

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

"Violence: A Hidden hand" written by by Zamurrad Awan



Violence: A Hidden hand


The act of violence started from the incidents of humiliation with Mr Arbab Raheem and Dr Sher Afghan. Soon after it the horrific events spread in Karachi and then in Multan. It’s hard to accept it as a co-incident when the reasons are not enough to make such happenings. There are many speculations about the force behind these sinful acts. Though it’s hard to point out but still the rumors are in their go.

First Mr Arbab Rahemm was beaten by some apparently PPPP activists and after 2 days Dr Sher Afghan was harassed by the lawyers who were not actually identified as lawyers. The wounds of these events could even heal when on 9th April in Karachi violence erupted consequently five people burnt beyond recognition were among seven persons who lost their lives. Many buses and vehicles were burnt off in the incident.

Another event happened on 14th April in Multan which is a hometown of Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gillani, where riots erupted when thousands of workers of local powerloom industry staged a demonstration against WAPDA for its failure to stop frequent load shading. The demonstrators attacked on offices, vehicles and bank buildings. It’s really some thing fishy to see the load shading in all over the country but the violence erupted in the town of PM only. It definitely makes the linkages between the above mentioned events.
The country is passing through its sensitive phase as the real sense of democracy is in its process of attainment. First the government should inquire all these incidents in less time and they should punish them before the media so that people could know the real faces behind these shameful incidents.

However there are some powers who want to derail the democratic structures because they didn’t accept the mandate of people whole heartedly. Therefore to destabilize the new government they are keep on doing intrigues. To avoid the further incidents it’s quite important to restore the real democracy by fulfilling the promises on the part of wining parties so that the common man could rehabilitate his trust in democratic system. However it’s the time for Mushraff to accept his defeat through political forces with the back up of public demand therefore he should actually think to quit now.
Zamurrad Awan

PPPP vs MQM: The politics of Alliance is the need of time




PPPP vs MQM: The politics of Alliance is the need of time

Moving towards the politics of reconciliation is a new trend in Pakistani politics where the history witnesses the politics of revenge. Since the election results have been declared the major political parties Pakistan Peoples party and Pakistan Muslim Leagues stresses upon the policy of cooperation among political forces though it’s not an easy task to cling with however it could be only the way to survive in current circumstances.

PPPP, PML (N) and ANP joined there hands and with the processes of dialogue Muthida Qaumi Movement also agreed to sit with government in the national interest of Pakistan. To make them on table, Mr Zardari himself went to nine-zero in Karachi where he met with the important figures of MQM. No doubt he received warm welcome from MQM Consequently the differences were erased.


However after the violent move in Karachi on 9th April suddenly the strategy of MQM has changed although they were facing a pressure from opposition parties before. Therefore finally MQM decided to sit in opposition benches in National Assembly as well as in Sindh Assembly. Dr Farooq Sattar blamed the PPPP responsible for this dead lock in talks between two parties.

The first reason is that, MQM leadership thinks that PPP made an earnest effort to engage Mutahida. Therefore the same gestures were not made at their visit in Naudero which MQM made at Zardari’s arrival at nine-zaro.

The second reason is MQM have reservations on the appointment of Shoaib Suddle as the Inspector-General of the Sindh Police. Suddle is controversial figure as Mutahida bale him for the murders of activists carried out allegedly by the Sindh police in the mid-1990 when he was a DIG Karachi. However PPP-SB also condemned Suddle appointment as he was one of the accused in the murder trial of Murtaza Bhutto and six other men.

The third reason is that the MQM demand for a power-sharing accord based on the number of seats won by the parties involved which was remained unmet.

What ever are the reasons behind this deadlock but it will definitely effect the political environment of reconciliation. It can also strengthen the powers who want to derail the democratic process in Pakistan. The need of time is to engage all the political forces in to the political process by ignoring differences as it’s the only way of survival for democracy in the presence of immediate issues. The dialogue process should start again which should be above the personal interests.
Zamurrad Awan

Wednesday, April 9, 2008

Musharraf : trying to hang out with power


political alliances vs conspiracies


Karachi at fire, where not a sinlge leaf can move without one force

Intrigues against Democracy

Intrigues against Democracy


“Politics is a bloody game.” A common statement really has its strong message and the events of this week prove it exact. The shameful incident with Ghulam Arbab Rarhim in Sindh Assembly on 7th April was highly condemned by all political parties. The incident happened when Mr Ghulam Arbab was going out of the Assembly and an angry mob of activists encircled him and hurled abuses on him. Meanwhile one man hit Arbab’s face with a shoe where as other workers did try to hit him with fists and shoes. The security persons encircled him and took him to his car. The angry mob didn’t leave him yet and attacked to his car and broke its window glasses.

In response, MQM and PML(Q) threw up the responsibility of this incident on PPPP as the slogans were Pro-Bhutto however an immediate press statement from Bilawal House denied any link with the event by saying it a plot against PPP which involves PPP (Shaheed Bhutoo) workers.
The second incident happened with former Minister for Law and Parliamentary affairs Dr Sher Afgan Niazi when he was on a visit to Malik Noor Ahmad Awan, an advocate, to discuss his election petition and hundreds of lawyers converged there and kept waiting four hours for the former minister to come out. The lawyers were demanding to meet Mr Afghan as they were having eggs and shoes in their hands to throw.

When the situation went out of control, Lahore police Chief Malik Iqbal requested Chaudhary Aitezaz Ahsan to reach so that Mr Niazi could be rescue. Mr Aitezaz reached to the place and requested lawyers to disperse peacefully which couldn’t make any effect on the mob. As soon as Mr Niazi was brought out mob swooped down on him from all directions. They seized him by the collar and dragged him in to the vehicle. They thrashed him with fists and kicks and repeatedly were punching him after broking the windows of the Eidhi Ambulance in which he was being bored by Police officers and Aitezaz Ahasan. To see the violent mob Aitezaz climbed over the ambulance and requested them to leave it consequently he was rescued.

The event once again strained the environment of country, especially when the session of Punjab Assembly was going to be assembled next day. After the event Mr Ahsan called a press conference in which he highly condemned the incident and decided to resign from his office of President of the Supreme Court Bar Association after failing in his effort to persuade lawyers to allow Dr Niazi a safe passage.

These two shameful events have some similarities which leave some clue to reach the actual culprits. The first is that the security lapses definitely played their visible role in both objectionable occurrences. Mr Aitezaz told the press conference that he again and again asked officers to call more police but they didn’t pay heed on his request as the mob was extremely violent and the number of police officers was not sufficient enough to control them. And when with the great effort Mr Niazi was bored in an ambulance, the driver of was not there to drive which showed some pre-planned conspiracy behind this whole event. The same security lapses were identified in the event with Dr Arbab, when the administration and police allowed everyone to enter in assembly by issuing them passes without investigation.

The second similarity is that the two personalities which were targeted formally belonged to PPPP before their inclusion in PML(Q), so that the direction of this conspiracy could go to the ruling party PPPP. However the PPPP is continuously working on the policy of reconciliation since the results of election are declared. The co-chairman Mr zardari is continuously trying to make all political parties unit in the democratic process and at this point of time he himself cant afford any such incident.

The third similarity is that when these incidents happened the administrative control was under the caretaker government who was actually responsible to ensure security measures in both provinces, so the ultimate credit of both event go to them.

Another important factor cant be ignore that the environment of political reconciliation which emerged after the elections was totally negating the role PML(Q) in the form of opposition party which made them insecure about their status in new government. It can be possible and they maneuver these incidents to create chaos in country so that they could oppose the ruling parties on these grounds as after elections Shiekh Rasheed gave a statement that now the bloody politics would take place in Pakistan. Unconsciously he revealed the conspirators of these events in his statement.

The intrigues to sabotage the democratic process are active however the people of Pakistan are in quest of peace and progress in country. These incidents are defaming Pakistan on international level beside those who have the opinion that “democracy doesn’t suits to Pakistan.” The new government requires being vigilant enough to smell all conspiracies so that the heavy damages could be avoided.

However the situation demands from Pervaiz Musharraf to resign who didn’t even give a single statement on these incidents, therefore people of Pakistan are becoming violent to see him out of the scene so that bloody politics could end up. This situation could get a better turn only in the absence of Musharaff, who is continuously backing the conspirators in politics to derail the democratic process.

Zamurrad Awan
zamurredawan@yahoo.com

Thursday, April 3, 2008

FATA: A sensitive region to deal with by Shehzadi Zamurrad Awan

FATA: A sensitive Region to deal with

The Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) considers as a sensitive areas of Pakistan because of its religious extremism. This region comprises of 27,220 km with the population of 3,341,070 people according to the data collected in 2000 which is the 2% of Pakistan’s population. The area comprises on Seven Agencies, namely Khyber, Kurram, Bajaur, Mohmand, Orakzi, North and West area of Waziristan.

The geographical location of FATA is significantly important as it bordered by Afghanistan to the west, North-West Frontier Province, the Punjab to the east, and Balouchistan to the south. In past the people of this area were used by US against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan with Taliban (Organization of Afghanistan) and were well motivated under the concept of Jihad. The religious constrains hovered over the minds of people of this area consequently they started rebellious movements in the region.

Though the region is controlled by the central government of Pakistan but the main administrative body remained Pashtun tribes in this region. The strength of the tribal system even in the colonial age couldn’t let the Britishers rule over the region. As a result they made Frontier Crime Regulation in this area. Unfortunately after independence this area remained a neglected one and no government tried to declare the old laws of colonial rule null and void. Though the people of this area even not in favor of FCR and they demand for the equal rights as the people of 4 provinces are getting being the citizens of Pakistan.

The decision of new government to revoke FCR is daunting measure though this decision contains lot of risks in itself. Although the final decision would be taken through the parliament but it would be vigilant if the government acquires some changes rather then immediately finishing it. Otherwise it could cause the chaos in the area. Secondly the area has been neglected over the 60 years, it desperately need the developmental programs.

The Prim Minister Makhdoom Youaf Raza Gillani definitely throw light on the policy of new government regarding this area by keeping in mind the role of Pakistan in War against terrorism. He while understanding the sentiments of the people of this area decided to deal with the situation vigilantly. Therefore he asserted “I appeal to all the people to shun violence and join us in the journey of democracy. We are ready to talk to all those who will give up their weapons and opt for peace.” He acknowledged the need of socio-economic reforms in the area so that poverty and illiteracy could be removing to avoid social ills which are breeding the terrorism. Simultaneously, US is continuously blaming at the area to support Talibanisation which is a permanent threat to the world security paradigm therefore they considered theses people “irreconcilable militants” to which no talk is required. However the government policy regarding the problem is having its worth.

Another important step the government is needed to stop cross border infiltration by closing it borders so that this area could get rid of the influence of Taliban in Afghanistan. Right now the area demands for the sense of security from inner so that the out threats could be avoided. Therefore all the decisions with the consensus of people and all political alliances are required in near future.

Shehzadi Zamurrad Awan
zamurredawan@yahoo.com

Saturday, March 29, 2008

US Reservation to the New Government of Pakistan

US Reservation to the New Government of Pakistan

The scenerio of Pakistani politics has changed over the sudden visit of US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte and Assistant Secretary of State Richard Boucher with his diplomatic corps to Pakistan.

They met with President Pervez Musharraf, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, National Assembly Speaker Dr Fehmida Mirza, PPP Co-chairman Asif Ali Zardari, PML-N leader Nawaz Sharif and Army Chief Gen Ashfaq Pervez Kayani and discussed various issues. This visit of US officials definitely creates suspicions regarding their discussion to all political forces of Pakistan as the country is passing through the sensitive phase of its political history.

Thought the US officials are now and then commencing their good will to the new government in the country but still in post their violent intervention in the state affairs dose not favor their statements. The analysts are stressing upon the two dimensions of their visit to Pakistan at this point of time.

The first one is that they want to make there reservations clear on war against terrorism to the new government. Conversely the government is looking forward all the decisions through debate. Negroponte while expressing his views negates the Pakistani government will to holding a talk with extremists as he considers them “irreconcilable” militants who are not worthy to be talk with. It’s a clear fact that every country has its own ground realities and without listening to the view point of others you can not reach to the conclusion so it would be better for the government now to take independent policy regarding its role though it remained a front line state in war against terrorism. The meetings of US officials with the coalition partners of government conveys the message that now the decision would take place from the flour of parliament which is the supreme authority of state.

The second dimension of there visit is a shelter to Presidency as Mr Musharaff remained very useful to US policies in past though US officials rejected this view by saying “it’s the part of political process in Pakistan and US will respect whatever would be decided about the former Army General.” They expressed that we are here just to congratulate the new government in Pakistan and we reaffirms or friendship and support to them.

The official statements of US officials seem fishy as it didn’t happen in past. The visit of US diplomat immediately after the oath taking ceremony does not appear a coincident. It shows that the new Assembly is not just having challenges inside the country but definitely having lot of pressure from out side on various issues of their concern.

Its really a time to take vigilant decision as the Assembly is under a spot light and its all conduct are deeply monitored by the people of Pakistan who gave the government a heavy mandate and also by the international players who wanted to attain their own particular interests in our country.

Shehzadi Zamurrad Awan
zamurredawan@yahoo.com

Monday, March 24, 2008

The stunning gestures of New Prime-Minister

Makhdoom Yousaf Raza Gillani, who was named as the candidate of the PPP-led coalition of election won with 264 votes in Assembly where as the candidate of joint opposition Chaudhary Pervaiz Illahi got 42 votes only. That’s was undoubtedly a memorable movement in the history of Pakistan.

The stunning movement didn’t only remind the PPP workers the glimpses of Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto in the parliament but also ensure a new start to the people of Pakistan who are seeking a new and prosperous country in future. In this regard, the first address of Mr. Gillani being a prime Minister of Pakistan highlighted the agendas of government policies where he talk about the resolution of the hot issue of Pakistan “restoration of Judiciary”. He promptly ordered to make all the judges free from consequently the bars were removed from the premises of judges colony. Along t\with this he cleared the policy of his party (PPP) who has decided to ask UN for the investigation of Shaheed Benazir Bhutto.
In his address,Mr Gillani called himself “servant of the people” rather then a ruler. He vowed to the people of Pakistan that the new government will solve all the issues with the consensus of all parties. The prime responsibility of the newly elected government is the restoration of 1973 constitution so that the supremacy of parliament can be restore. While addressing to the Assembly he requested the Judges movement to stop protesting and if they have any reservations regarding their status then they should make it to the notice of Parliament which is a supreme authority of the country.

the first address of Mr Gillani definitely a healthy attempt of a democratic government. However the coalition government is seeking the resignation of Mr Musharaff whose ally party has been totally rejected by the People of Pakistan. It is an open question of debate that the policies which the elected government through the parliament is having on agenda are expected to have a confrontation with the presidency. To avoid this situation of conflict its better for Mr Musharaff to resign and submit his will to the new government his game is over now and the ball is out of his code.


Shehzadi Zamurrad Awan

Asif Ali Zardari: A Shrewd Politician

The Co-Charmain of Pakistan Peoples Party and the husband of Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Mr Asif Ali Zardari is proving himself as a profound and vigorous politician which is definitely his new look to the people who known him as a “Mr 10 percent”. The death of Benazir Bhutto definitely make Mr Zardari more conscious and alert then past where he was entrenched in various corruption charges. As for as his new look is concerned, he is giving a glimpse of a real politician with the qualities of openness flexibility and persuasiveness. The current policy of PPPP no doubt is making a smooth path for the upcoming leader of the house who can not only face all the challenges but could also play his role of cooperation among all the alliances in parliament. The countdown for the post of Prime minister has been begun. The people of Pakistan and the Media are very keen to know the official decision of PPPP for its candidate of PM. In this regard Mr Zardi is at his best. He is arranging his meetings not with the alliance of PPPP but the parties of opposition too that shows his mature politics. He has opened his doors for negotiation to all parties. Recently he talked to MQM learder Iltaf Hussain, consequently Dr Farooq Satar of MQM, who was a candidate for the post of PM from combined opposition his name in favour of PPPP and assured the peoples party for the MQM support. Farooq Sattar allegedly expressed his views that MQM is ready to play its positive role either the government PPPP wants them on opposition benches or to be an ally in the government making process we have opened our doors for cooperation. Such type of friendly statements will definitely strengthen the democratic values in the country. Although there are the rumors of confrontation over the nomination of candidate for the leader of house in PPPP as the party is facing a leadership vacuum after the sudden death of Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto. Right now the four senior members of Pakistan Peoples Party are running in the race of candidature. One is Makhdoom Yousaf Raza Gillani, second one is Ahmed Mukhtar, third one is Shah Mehmood Qurasehi and the forth one is Makhdoom Ameen Faheem. It’s not at all an easy task to select one out of these senior and important members of party. The party under the guidance of Mr Zardari is trying to reach the decision under which the party can be united at the same time they could get a candidate who can run the affairs efficiently with the party Alliance in the Assembly. The responsibility is very sensitive for the co-chairman of PPPP as he has shown full honestly and consciousness for his all decisions up to now. The important thing is the consensus of this part for the nomination of candidature so that the government can deals with the real challenges of its time

Shehzadi Zamurrad Awan
e.mail: zamurredawan@yahoo.com

Challenges of New Assembly in Pakistan

The first session of the 13th National Assembly of Pakistan was chaired by the outgoing Speaker, Chaudhary Ameer Hussain.
In future, this assembly will be grappling with various issues, created by the previous government in their 8 years rule, and further intensified by the caretaker government, which went away from its basic responsibility.
This parliament is a mixture of industrialists, landed Aristocracy along with manynew faces. Consequently the Assembly is a good and healthy combination of seasoned politicians along with young incumbents. The parliament started with a positive mood as for the first time the traditional opponents join hands for the collective purposes. In the past they were bitterly opposed to each other on almost every issue.
The first challenge to this newly elected legislature is the restoration of judiciary, which was the slogan of various Political parties, especially PML(N). This movement activated the whole country towards the change. Both PPPP and PML(N)being the important parties agreed to restore the judiciary. According to critics it seems an immediate point of confrontation between the presidency and the parliament. The rest of the challenges include the energy crisis, wheat shortage, and high oil prices. The price hike has totally disturbed the life of a common man. Apart from these challenges, the law and order situation is further creating chaos in the form of suicide bombing in different parts of the country.
Time will tell that how the dictatorial mood of presidency cope with the democratic trend in the parliament. These problems will definitely give a tough time to the government.In this regard the president should resign and let the new parliament elect a new head of the State. So that the country could be saved from internal and external threats.

Zamurrad Awan
zamurredawan@yahoo.com