Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Dismembered Coalition Reveals the Truth by Yawar Hayat Shah & Zamurrad Awan


Dismembered Coalition Reveals the Truth



The most awaited talks between the head of ruling parties finally ended up on a sad note, as it was feared by a number political pundits that the honeymoon between Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and Pakistan Muslin League- Nawaz(PML-N)or, more specifically, between Asif Ali Zardari and Nawaz Sharif will not last. Since the government formation has completed, the judicial crisis was seeking an immediate resolution, though the other issues remained a matter of serious concern for the newly elected government.

The coalition government promised the nation in the ‘Bhurban Declaration’ that judicial crisis will be solved within thirty days of the creation of the government. Thirty of the April was set as the deadline for the restoration of the judiciary as it was on November 2, 2007. Due to some complexities it would not be happened on the April 30, 2008 and the new deadline was announced in Dubai Talks by both parties that was May 12, 2008.

Last fifteen days made an environment of the country more suspicious as the PPP and PML (N) hold discussions for hours together to sort out a way, but both parties told the media that they had failed to bridge differences over the route to take for the reinstatement of the deposed judges. Leadership of both parties was there in London to hold talks on the issue. Despite the last minute intervention of the US Assistant Secretary of State Richard Boucher, London Talks collapsed.

Finally 12th May proved itself a decisive one and PML leaders reached back to Pakistan. After having long meetings with the headship of Pakistan People Party in London, Pakistan Muslim League (N) decided to quit from the federal cabinet. Nawaz sharif while talking with media that his party will not become a part of any conspiracy against the democratic government and will not strengthened the President Musharraf camp. He told the media that his party will sit on the treasury benches and will support the government according to the Charter of Democracy.

On the other hand, Co-chairman of PPP Asif Ali Zaradari has requested to Nawaz Sharif through a phone call and requested to hold his decision of resignation from the Federal Government till his return from London. He also has announced that the portfolios of the PML (N) ministers will be kept vacant and no candidate will contest against Nawaz Sharif in by-poll. He advised the Prime Mininster Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani not to accept the resignation of PML (N) ministers. He is confident that the PML ( N) would return to the fold of the coalition soon.

PPP’s stance is that an illegal and unconstitutional action cannot be undo by taking equally illegal and unconstitutional step. This domino effect will cause the fall of whole administrative system of the state. Party is reiterating that judiciary will be restored through a resolution in parliament along with a constitutional package that wil ensure the supremacy and independence of the judiciary. PML (N) stressed government that it should announce the reinstatement of deposed judges through an executive order.

So it can be analyzed that the differences between the two parties were over the modalities and not on the objective of the restoration of the judiciary. As both parties are still emphasizing that judiciary will be restored as it was promised with the masses of Pakistan,

At this point in time, media is playing a role of catalyst, different news channels are telecasting diverse version of news. Every channel is interpreting the issue in its own way to create more ambiguity among the masses. Some News channels had telecasted the news that Nawaz Sharif has declared the end of coalition. In reality he did not talk about the break up of the coalition. In the time of this kind of deadlock media should not play irresponsible role to create a state of disappointment among people. Both leaders have political heads and knew the hopes and aspiration of the people of the land. They are taking steps like shrewd politicians and playing their card tactically. As PPP’s Co-Chairman declared that PPP will continue the support of PML (N) government in Punjab. Therefore, it can be judged that coalition has not come to its end. In fact, the both ruling parties are not in the position to quit the alliance, which is pertinent to sustain democracy in the country.
Yawar Hayat Shah
Zamurrad Awan

Monday, May 5, 2008

A Blur Statement of Election Commission on delaying by-polls


A Blur Statement of Election Commission on delaying by-polls


Suddenly, a suspected environment took place in the country over the postponement of by-polls in the country on 5th May. The plea presented by Election Commission, under taking such step was “deteriorating law and order situation”, which was undoubtedly an irrational statement according to the current security situation. It was an abrupt decision with out taking the ruling elite in to the confidence, therefore it provoked they democratic process once again in the country.

The quick reaction was seen by Pakistan Peoples Party, Pakistan Muslim League (N) and the coalition partners, who consider it a conspiracy against the new government under the order of presidency. These by-elections were of great significant as the important leaders like Mr. Shehbaz Sharif, Capatin Safdar from PML(N) whereas An important figure Barrister Aitezaz Ahsan and the co-chairman of PPP Mr Asif Ali Zardari was going to take part. These figures since the election commenced on 18th February are keeping on condemning the presidency. Resultantly, in make the Musharff’s restless as he is no more considered to be fit in this office. However, its important to note that ‘The Wall Street Journal’ reported on Monday that Musharraf seeks a deal with PPP to secure his position as he isn’t agree to quit his powers as president of the state. Conversely, he is worried about the restoration f judges, who ready after the re-instatement to ditch his rule

In this situation, its not easy for government to take the decision on the restoration of judges, on the other hand, they don’t have any other way to move without full-filling their promise as the expectations of the people of Pakistan are high enough. Therefore, it seems as the ruling parties are trying to find the middle way to secure both ends though the Musharff is keep on derailing the democratic system by planning intrigues against the new set-up. The situation could only be improved if Musharff accepts his defeat open heartedly as he has plundered the country by all means.


Shehzadi Zamurrad Awan

Politicize Justice by Shehzadi Zamurrad Awan






Politicize Justice

The election of 18th February did not only decide the real will of the people of Pakistan but also gave a great sense of responsibility to the new government. The main alliance parties in government, Pakistan Peoples Party and Pakistan Muslim League (N), soon after the election results focused on the issue resolving strategy with the help of consensus building among the power sharing parties. The first issue which was acknowledged to be the most important one among all powers sharing powers was the restoration of Justice by re-instatement of all judges. After this, it was expected that the lawyers’ movement would exclude the element of violence from their struggle. However, the immediate events after the making of new government proved this expectation a fake one.

To re-instate the judges on the position of 9th March is not an easy task as it apparently perceives, especially when the government is bound to work with an un-constitutional man in the form of president. Though, judiciary being a separate institution has its sanctity which could only be maintained after the re-instatement of judges, however, for the smooth change, its important to give the government proper time to resolve this issue without emphasizing on the particular ultimatums.

The incident with former Minister for Law and Parliamentary affairs Dr Sher Afgan Niazi on 8th April in Lahore was an effort to defame the lawyers’ movement and lot of deliberations took place by the lawyers. However, the reverse action was seen in Karachi, in which eleven people were killed, at least six of them feared to be lawyers, and several others injured when violence broke on the clash between two groups of lawyers outside the City. These two events significantly affected the lawyers’ movement. Mr.Aitezaz Ahzan, the president Supreme Court, continuously kept on identifying some hidden hands that are doing intrigues against the lawyers’ movement.

The incident on 5th March in Rawalpindi Bar is an important one, where Aitezaz Ahsan was going to address about his contest in by-polls from NA-55; suddenly a fight had started between the two groups of lawyers. However, it was controlled by the senior lawyers. But again when Mr Aitezaz started his speech again, a lawyer used an abusive language against one of the correspondent of TV channel, which disturbed the whole gathering. Therefore, Media boycotted the conference; however it was patched up after a while.

Justice is not a matter of once own choice. It’s the universal phenomenon which should not be used for the personal benefit of any person or party. To keep the lawyers struggle alive, it’s important, not to politicize it. Otherwise it would loose its real objective and the struggle for the restoration of judges would be derailed.

Zamurrad Awan
zamurredawan@yahoo.com